Movie Review - Brighton Rock (2011)

Thursday, 3 February 2011

Brighton Rock, 2011.

Written and Directed by Rowan Joffe.
Starring Sam Riley, Andrea Riseborough, Andy Serkis, Helen Mirren and John Hurt.

Brighton Rock
SYNOPSIS:

Pinkie (Sam Riley) is a young gangster in 60s Brighton who must seduce the naïve Rose (Andrea Riseborough) after she is a potential witness to to a murder Pinkie's gang committed.

Brighton Rock
The first image of Brighton Rock is a top-down shot of the sea at night, black and impenetrable, while the score washes waves of menacing strings over the audience. You can't help but think of Scorsese's latest masterpiece Shutter Island and in terms of tone, this is a fair comparison, director Rowan Joffe nailing the film noir mix of shadowy visuals and forboding music perfectly. Cinematographer John Mathieson completely outdoes himself here, utilising vintage 60's camera lenses and a lens built specially for the film by Panavision to portray 1960s Brighton as a town on the edge, where the garish beach houses and tacky entertainment clash with the shadowy underworld lurking underneath, clawing it's way upward. Mathieson combines wide, beautiful panoramic shots with some clever smaller shots too, such as a corpse POV shot as the coffin lid is closed. Another flashy but not distracting shot is when Pinkie first speaks to Rose and appears to raise a pistol and shoot her, before it is revealed he's actually at a pier shooting game, the trick-shot acting as a signifier of the danger Rose is letting herself in for and the cold, psychopathic and selfish nature of Pinkie.

Sam Riley plays the young gangster Pinkie as a desperate but inexperienced character, eyes on the prize but not on his back, his cold, psychotic demeanor a front for the extremely vulnerable boy underneath. Riley is simply magnetic, his performance oozing menace and unpredictability, his cold stare and shrewd, flickering eyes give the impression that he's going to snap at any second. Andrea Riseborough on the other hand, portrays Rose as almost Pinkie's opposite, extremely vulnerable and naïve on the surface, but fiercely loyal at her core. Riseborough's scenes with Riley are almost painful to watch, so acutely the performances capture the awkwardness and confusion of characters wrestling with their own defects, and in Pinkie's case, lashing out to reinforce his masculinity. Equally compelling is the always reliable Helen Mirren, cast as Ida, who owns the tea shop Rose works in. A headstrong, confident yet warm character, Mirren imbues Ida with the perfect amount of class, compassion and wit, acting as the perfect counter-point to Riley's rough anti-hero.

The entire film, (like the novel and the majority of Greene's work) is shot through with catholic guilt. For one, its Pinkie's primary reason for his ever-escalating fear throughout the film. While he's terrified of dying, he's even more afraid of the eternal damnation awaiting him. In an early scene with Rose he talks of Hell, almost resigned to his supposed fate, for when Rose asks him 'What about Heaven?' he expresses disbelief that he'll ever see it. When he is chased by a rival gang and almost killed, Pinkie hides behind a beach-divider, drops to his knees and prays desperately, blood running from his hands, begging forgiveness when he believes he's close to the end. Greene himself converted to Catholicism so that he could marry his wife, and this struggle between himself and catholic teachings was a huge influence on his work, looming over his life, just as in a scene when Rose goes to a church to pray and it's filmed from just over the shoulder of a giant crucifix, hanging over the scene and the entire film. Pinkie speaks of how he's is proud to be a Roman Catholic, but he is fully aware that the things he's done and the path he's chosen to take will lead him to damnation, this contradiction further embellishing Pinkie as a complicated, terrified young man.

Adaptations from books can frequently fall into pitfalls when they change crucial details such as the setting or the time period, although some, like High Fidelity's move from England to Chicago are seamless and suit the interpretation. Thankfully, Brighton Rock's move from 30s Brighton to 1964 is not only seamless but actually enriches the story. 1964 was the last year that the death penalty was in place in England, avoidance of the gallows being one of Pinkie's driving factors. A superbly lensed dream sequence where Pinkie finds himself hung over the crashing sea of the first shot is as telling as it is elegant, the sea representing the sprawling damnation in Hell that Pinkie faces if he is caught. Another masterstroke in the films re-setting is that 1964 was the year of clashes between youth gangs the mods and the rockers, taking over Brighton and representing one of the first years of British youth empowerment, a new wave of youth culture which left the older generation terrified. In the middle of all this unrest, Pinkie's confused young gangster fits perfectly, a distinct crystallisation of a youth movement which want it all and aren't afraid to reach out and take it.

Brighton Rock is a compelling noir tale, beautifully filmed and perfectly realised. Superbly acted throughout, with Sam Riley's performance so magnetically menacing you simply can't tear you eyes away from him. A superb adaptation Graham Greene would surely be proud of, and a perfect example of all the elements in a film coming together seamlessly. Well done to all involved.

Roger Holland

Movie Review Archive
Share this article :

6 comments:

  1. im sorry mr holland but i cant agree with you on this one. i have to question whether you have a> seen the original b> watched the same film that i did?

    brighton rock felt tonally all over the place. from its like noir-ish beginnings, it quickly loses sight and ramps us the drama to gothic over-tones. not helped by a particularly over-bearing and intrusive soundtrack that lays on the emotion that a particularly poor script cannot provide. whilst everyone is well cast for physicality and past work, no-one has much material to work with. riley has menace yes but riseborough and mirren are left with poorly written female characters. not shocking as joffe's previous script work was on the american, which had levels of misogyny that border on the offensive. ill give props to nonsie alonso for some prime comedic performance as an indestructible hulk figure that can wrench car doors off of their hinges.
    admittedly i may have mis-read the film. rather than the boulton brothers version which aims for a gritty noir feel, joffe takes greene's novel to a dark pantomine. characters are painted in broad brushstrokes (serkis's crime lord a key example) as is the director's take on the main themes. meditation of catholic guilt, the rebellion of youth, rites of passage tale? brighton rock is all these things yet doesnt have much to say with any of them. the transference to 60s Brighton provides some aesthetic and historical changes but unlike many relocations of tales (Kurosawa's take on Macbeth in the form of Throne of Blood, hell Disney can even manage it with the Lion King). Joffe wants the 60s to represent the youth rebellion but frankly his aim is all over the shop as he's bitten off more than he can chew.

    all in all. a frustrating watch.

    sorry rant over.

    much love
    ashley
    x

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah Mr Ashley! Well to answer your first questions, no I haven't seen the original, and I'm reasonably sure we watched the same film?

    I quite liked the tone throughout actually, the way it builds to a rather hysterical third act, but I will agree with you that, yes, the music does become unnecessarily overpowering at times, towards the end at least.

    It's also fair to argue that the script is rather sparse but the core of the film is Pinkie and Rose's fear, realised extremely well by both leads I felt.

    And no I haven't seen the American. Is it that bad?

    But I'm glad we can disagree so vehemently and remain such good friends! ; p

    Rog

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm sorry but this film is awful. I and the sparse audience trudged out of the cinema last night thoroughly depressed not by the subject matter but by the film. Who cares if it looks great when the script is a dog and the performances are so poor?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm sorry but this film is awful. I and the sparse audience trudged out of the cinema last night thoroughly depressed not by the subject matter but by the film. Who cares if it looks great when the script is a dog and the performances are so poor?

    ReplyDelete
  5. im sorry mr holland but i cant agree with you on this one. i have to question whether you have a> seen the original b> watched the same film that i did?

    brighton rock felt tonally all over the place. from its like noir-ish beginnings, it quickly loses sight and ramps us the drama to gothic over-tones. not helped by a particularly over-bearing and intrusive soundtrack that lays on the emotion that a particularly poor script cannot provide. whilst everyone is well cast for physicality and past work, no-one has much material to work with. riley has menace yes but riseborough and mirren are left with poorly written female characters. not shocking as joffe's previous script work was on the american, which had levels of misogyny that border on the offensive. ill give props to nonsie alonso for some prime comedic performance as an indestructible hulk figure that can wrench car doors off of their hinges.
    admittedly i may have mis-read the film. rather than the boulton brothers version which aims for a gritty noir feel, joffe takes greene's novel to a dark pantomine. characters are painted in broad brushstrokes (serkis's crime lord a key example) as is the director's take on the main themes. meditation of catholic guilt, the rebellion of youth, rites of passage tale? brighton rock is all these things yet doesnt have much to say with any of them. the transference to 60s Brighton provides some aesthetic and historical changes but unlike many relocations of tales (Kurosawa's take on Macbeth in the form of Throne of Blood, hell Disney can even manage it with the Lion King). Joffe wants the 60s to represent the youth rebellion but frankly his aim is all over the shop as he's bitten off more than he can chew.

    all in all. a frustrating watch.

    sorry rant over.

    much love
    ashley
    x

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ah Mr Ashley! Well to answer your first questions, no I haven't seen the original, and I'm reasonably sure we watched the same film?

    I quite liked the tone throughout actually, the way it builds to a rather hysterical third act, but I will agree with you that, yes, the music does become unnecessarily overpowering at times, towards the end at least.

    It's also fair to argue that the script is rather sparse but the core of the film is Pinkie and Rose's fear, realised extremely well by both leads I felt.

    And no I haven't seen the American. Is it that bad?

    But I'm glad we can disagree so vehemently and remain such good friends! ; p

    Rog

    ReplyDelete

 
© 2009-2013 Flickering Myth. All rights reserved. The reproduction, modification, distribution, transmission or republication of the content (including RSS feeds) without permission is strictly prohibited. Movie titles, images, etc. are registered trademarks / copyright their respective rights holders. Read our Privacy Policy / Cookie Disclaimer.