• Pop Culture
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Comic Books
    • Video Games
    • Toys & Collectibles
  • Features
    • News
    • Reviews
    • Articles and Opinions
    • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Flickering Myth Films
    • FMTV
  • About
    • About Flickering Myth
    • Write for Flickering Myth
    • Advertise on Flickering Myth
  • Socials
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Bluesky
    • Instagram
    • Flipboard
    • Linktree
    • X
  • Terms
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

Flickering Myth

Geek Culture | Movies, TV, Comic Books & Video Games

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Articles & Opinions
  • Write for Us
  • The Baby in the Basket

Movie Review – The Haunting of Sharon Tate (2019)

March 10, 2019 by EJ Moreno

The Haunting of Sharon Tate, 2019.

Directed by Daniel Farrands.
Starring Hilary Duff, Jonathan Bennett, Lydia Hearst, Pawel Szajda.

SYNOPSIS:

Young and promising actress Sharon Tate becomes plagued by visions of her imminent death. Inspired by an actual quote from Tate, the film follows the events that led to the murder of her and her friends by the Manson Family.

Before diving fully into The Haunting of Sharon Tate, there’s one thing to make very clear. This film tells the story it wants, stretching or making up things for the sake of the narrative. But the difference between this and the controversy of a movie like Green Book is you know The Haunting of Sharon Tate is taking full liberty with the material. Sure the film is inspired by the quote from Sharon Tate about having a nightmare of her murder, but there’s a lot that director Daniel Farrands adds to this. You know this is still entertainment above anything else.

Yes, there’s no lacking in the entertainment department here. The word campy doesn’t begin to describe The Haunting of Sharon Tate as it ranges from “so bad” to “so bad, it’s good” at the drop of a hat. There’s a shocking moment about halfway through the film where you know all bets are off, and this is going to do something different.

This point is where a viewer chooses how to view the rest of the film; you either hate it for being exploitive or accept the nonsense. I went with the latter and found myself shaking my head in bewilderment for the next 45 minutes. There was no shortage of surprises and shocks along the way, no matter if it’s for better or worse.

What surprises me the most – good and bad – is the cast. Jonathan Bennett and Hilary Duff feel like the pickings of a strange millennial fever-dream as the two are most famous with ’00s audiences, not exactly the core demographic for a story about Tate murders. Jonathan Bennet does fine in his role, never having enough material to hinder the film but not chewing up the scenery as needed. That’s a job for Hilary Duff who carries the film with her odd impression of Sharon Tate and final girl finale. Giving her a new spin on the story allows Duff to turn Tate into a much different character. Again, it might not be in the best taste, but it saves from watching another similar story about this tragic event.

There’s a particular aesthetic for this film, and they drive it home. A lot of soft lighting, very ’60s. The first five minute features enough color correction filters that it feels like scrolling through Instagram. Let’s not forget the long panning shots or slow, creepy dolly zooms. And the use of archive footage feels like a lot of the music videos you’d see from a hipster musician. It ends up feeling like a Lana Del Rey music video. At least that’s a highlight for the film as low-budget features like this usually lack artistic direction.

While discussing the technical side, it feels like a good time to point out the odd audio for the film. While the dialogue is relatively stilted due to the script, it also feels like there is a lot of ADR happening. ADR is when the actors go back into a studio to record lines, screams, or noises over again. Usually due to not picking it up on the set or it’s not what the directed intended. From the start, it feels like a lot of the audio was captured after as it just doesn’t feel like the actors are in the same scene.

When dealing with campy or provocative films, little technical mistakes will instantly throw off viewers and allow them to see other flaws. The idea is to immerse the viewer into your experience, never giving them a moment to catch their breathe or point out a mistake. There’s enough of them in The Haunting of Sharon Tate to take you out of the film and lowers the overall viewing experience.

There’s a key to a movie like The Haunting of Sharon Tate: you can’t hold anything back, or it just seems like you aren’t taking anything seriously. In the theatre, it’s called “playing it for the back row.” That’s when you act so big that people in the back of the venue can see all of your actings. The filmmakers put in the effort and knew they were making a piece that was a bit over-the-top, but that doesn’t excuse all the mistakes.

Exploitive? Yes. Entertaining? Very. The Haunting of Sharon Tate plays more like a campy melodrama than a horror retelling of real events. The film isn’t great, but the insanity is still quite enjoyable.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★

EJ Moreno

Filed Under: EJ Moreno, Movies, Reviews Tagged With: Daniel Farrands, hilary duff, Jonathan Bennett, Lydia Hearst, Pawel Szajda, The Haunting of Sharon Tate

About EJ Moreno

EJ Moreno is a film and television critic and entertainment writer who joined the pop culture website Flickering Myth in 2018 and now serves as the executive producer of Flickering Myth TV, a YouTube channel with over 27,000 subscribers. With over a decade of experience, he is a Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic who is also part of the Critics Choice Association and GALECA: The Society of LGBTQ Entertainment Critics.

WATCH OUR MOVIE NOW FOR FREE ON PRIME VIDEO!

FMTV – Watch Our Latest Video Here

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:

Cannon Films and the Search for Critical Acclaim

Forgotten 2000s Comedies That Are Worth Revisiting

The Essential Films of John Woo

Forgotten Horror Movie Sequels You Never Need to See

13 Obscure Horror Movie Gems You Need to See

Hot Days of Horror: The Best Summer Horror Movies

Johnnie To, Hong Kong Cinema’s Modern Master

Forgotten Horror Movie Gems From 25 Years Ago

Ten Controversial Movies and the Drama Around Them

Sherlock Holmes at 15: The Story Behind Guy Ritchie’s Weirdly Fascinating Take on the Baker Street Super Sleuth

Top Stories:

Meet Jason and Lucia in the new Grand Theft Auto VI trailer

Poker Face Season 2 Review

The Most Terrifying Movie Psychopaths of the 1990s

Great Mob Movies You Might Have Missed

Gladiator at 25: The Story Behind Ridley Scott’s Sword-and-Sandal Epic

10 Forgotten 90s Action Movies That Deserve a Second Chance

Video Review – Clown in a Cornfield is the horror comedy you didn’t know you needed!

Movie Review – Friendship (2024)

STREAM FREE ON PRIME VIDEO!

FEATURED POSTS:

The Most Incredibly Annoying Movie Characters

The Most Iconic Cult Classics of All Time

Iconic 80s Movie Stars Who Disappeared

Ten Great Love Letters to Cinema

Our Partners

  • Pop Culture
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Comic Books
    • Video Games
    • Toys & Collectibles
  • Features
    • News
    • Reviews
    • Articles and Opinions
    • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Flickering Myth Films
    • FMTV
  • About
    • About Flickering Myth
    • Write for Flickering Myth
    • Advertise on Flickering Myth
  • Socials
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Bluesky
    • Instagram
    • Flipboard
    • Linktree
    • X
  • Terms
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

© Flickering Myth Limited. All rights reserved. The reproduction, modification, distribution, or republication of the content without permission is strictly prohibited. Movie titles, images, etc. are registered trademarks / copyright their respective rights holders. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. If you can read this, you don't need glasses.


 

Flickering MythLogo Header Menu
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Articles & Opinions
  • Write for Us
  • The Baby in the Basket