• Pop Culture
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Comic Books
    • Video Games
    • Toys & Collectibles
  • Features
    • News
    • Reviews
    • Articles and Opinions
    • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • FMTV on YouTube
  • About
    • About Flickering Myth
    • Write for Flickering Myth
    • Advertise on Flickering Myth
  • Socials
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Flipboard
    • Bluesky
    • Linktree
  • Terms
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

Flickering Myth

Geek Culture | Movies, TV, Comic Books & Video Games

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Articles & Opinions
  • The Baby in the Basket
  • Death Among the Pines

Movie Review – Delivery Man (2013)

January 18, 2014 by admin

Delivery Man, 2013

Directed by Ken Scott.
Starring Vince Vaughn, Chris Pratt and Cobie Smulders.

SYNOPSIS:

An affable underachiever finds out he’s fathered 533 children through anonymous donations to a fertility clinic 20 years ago. Now he must decide whether or not to come forward when 142 of them file a lawsuit to reveal his identity.

Marketing can be a funny thing. If you’ve seen the posters, trailers and the rest of the marketing material for Delivery Man, you’d be forgiven for thinking that this was 2014’s ‘Vince Vaughn wacky knock-about comedy’. His mere presence would suggest that the movie carries a light and comedic tone, but Ken Scott’s Delivery Man is not that film at all. For starters, it’s not even a comedy.

Delivery Man is an English language remake of Scott’s own French-Canadian movie Starbuck in which meat truck driver David Wozniak (Vaughn) discovers, through a mix-up at a fertility clinic he donated to in his younger days, he is the biological father of 533 children. Just as he discovers that his girlfriend Emma (an under-utilised Cobie Smulders) is pregnant herself, 140-odd of his illegitimate children step forward to demand that the anonymity clause in the clinic’s contracts be removed so they can find out who their father is.
A quirky story yes, but at it’s basic level, Delivery Man fails on two points – which sort of tie into each other; the marketing of the movie the casting of Vince Vaughn.
That’s not to say that Vaughn does a bad job, far from it. This is probably the best he’s looked since Swingers as he frees himself from the shackles of being the “loveable and cuddly” man child that stars alongside Owen Wilson, but he is simply wrong for the role. Perhaps its the reputation he has built and therefore carries into a movie, but Delivery Man needed an actor who an audience can take seriously in a ‘serious’ role and not expect comedy from at any given moment. At times Vaughn does slip into his comedy routines which can be a little jarring against the rest of the story. What’s funny is that the almost perfect actor for this part would have been his co-star Chris Pratt, who plays his best friend and lawyer Brett. With starring roles in The LEGO Movie and Guardians of the Galaxy this year, Pratt should really turn some heads before he takes on the lead role in next year’s Jurassic World and he is the kind of actor the David Wozniak role needed – someone who can carry a comedic edge, but still pull out a straight performance when needed. Vaughn’s casting further comes into question when placed against Cobie Smulders and while the two are quite good together, their relationship feels false as it’s hard to buy that someone like Smulders could fall for Vince Vaughn.

Before jumping into the second issue with the movie, it should also be noted that Delivery Man is a very “boys own” movie in that its solely fixated on male characters. David’s mother is dead, he doesn’t have any sisters and when he starts to meet his children, 80% of the focus is put on his sons with only two daughters worthy of note (one of which doesn’t appear to have any lines and is treated more as the ‘token black girl’ as opposed to a character). His girlfriend spends the majority of the movie off-screen mentioned only by name and when she is on-screen she simply serves as a reminder that she’s pregnant and to question Vaughn’s abilities as a father. But while the gender balance could (and should) have been handled much better, the main theme of the movie is a very “boys own” theme – who holds the right to determine fatherhood.

And this is where the marketing of the film fails. Delivery Man is not a Vince Vaughn comedy and is instead a drama that is trying to convey a message. The two scenes of “jokes” used in the trailers are perhaps the only scenes of the movie where a joke is even attempted and while there are moments in the film which raise a chuckle and/or a smile, they’re surrounded by a very serious tone. The movie delves into tough and dark issues such as parenting a handicap child, drug addiction and the scares that come with premature birth and while it doesn’t always handle them with perfect grace (some feel downright tacked on) it just about holds its head above water. Had Delivery Man been given a different leading man and made outside of the Hollywood system, this could have played well to a Sundance audience. In fact, the original movie Starbuck was shown at various festivals upon its release and was runner-up in the People’s Choice Award at the Toronto International Film Festival. And, from all accounts, the two films are identical. It may be marketed as one, but Delivery Man is not a comedy. Perhaps it was easier for the marketing team to slap Vince Vaughn pulling an “oh oh” face on a poster to get butts in seats as opposed to promoting a drama about the trials of fatherhood and the lengths one goes to help, support and show his love for his family?

Delivery Man was never going to be a five star classic, but with a better leading man it certainly could have been four. It tells its story very well, the script is tight (although a little gender-biased) and the acting is solid throughout – even the miscast Vaughn. Like Silver Linings Playbook, this story could have played to an audience who would have appreciated it, but instead it was pointed towards the “teen comedy fan” demographic as they’re a) easier to fool and b) larger in number. It’s a real shame. Delivery Man is by no means a great movie, but it has a lot of heart and deserved better treatment from its marketing and casting.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★

Luke Owen is one of Flickering Myth’s co-editors and the host of the Flickering Myth Podcast. You can follow him on Twitter @LukeWritesStuff.

Originally published January 18, 2014. Updated November 8, 2019.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

FMTV – Watch Our Latest Video Here

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:

Robin of Sherwood: Still the quintessential take on the Robin Hood legend

Eight Great Prison Movies You Might Have Missed

The Best Retro 2000 AD Video Games

Forgotten Horror Movie Gems From 25 Years Ago

From Banned to Beloved: Video Nasties That Deserve Critical Re-evaluation

LEGO Star Wars at 20: The Video Game That Kickstarted a Phenomenon

Nine Underrated Zombie Movies of the 2000s

Why the 80s and 90s Were the Most Enjoyable Era for Movies

7 Chilling Killer Kid Movies You Need To See

The Essential Action Movies of 1986

Top Stories:

Book Review – Death of Superman Absolute Edition

Movie Review – Solo Mio (2026)

Movie Review – The Strangers: Chapter 3 (2026)

A Knight of The Seven Kingdoms Episode 4 Review – ‘Seven’

10 Great Forgotten Gems of the 1980s You Need To See

Movie Review – Dracula (2025)

Movie Review – Jimpa (2025)

Movie Review – Sirāt (2025)

Movie Review – The Moment (2026)

Movie Review – Send Help (2026)

FLICKERING MYTH FILMS

 

FEATURED POSTS:

10 Essential Action Movies from 2005

90s Guilty Pleasure Thrillers So Bad They’re Actually Good

The Most Shocking Movies of the 1970s

Beyond Superman: The Essential Christopher Reeve Movies

  • Pop Culture
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Comic Books
    • Video Games
    • Toys & Collectibles
  • Features
    • News
    • Reviews
    • Articles and Opinions
    • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • FMTV on YouTube
  • About
    • About Flickering Myth
    • Write for Flickering Myth
    • Advertise on Flickering Myth
  • Socials
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Flipboard
    • Bluesky
    • Linktree
  • Terms
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

© Flickering Myth Limited. All rights reserved. The reproduction, modification, distribution, or republication of the content without permission is strictly prohibited. Movie titles, images, etc. are registered trademarks / copyright their respective rights holders. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. If you can read this, you don't need glasses.


 

Flickering MythLogo Header Menu
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Articles and Opinions
  • The Baby in the Basket
  • Death Among the Pines
  • About Flickering Myth
  • Write for Flickering Myth