• Pop Culture
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Comic Books
    • Video Games
    • Toys & Collectibles
  • Features
    • News
    • Reviews
    • Articles and Opinions
    • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • FMTV on YouTube
  • About
    • About Flickering Myth
    • Write for Flickering Myth
    • Advertise on Flickering Myth
  • Socials
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Flipboard
    • Bluesky
    • Linktree
  • Terms
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

Flickering Myth

Geek Culture | Movies, TV, Comic Books & Video Games

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Articles & Opinions
  • Flickering Myth Films

Simon Pegg explains why the Star Trek movie franchise has stalled

March 2, 2020 by Gary Collinson

It’s closing in on four years since we last saw the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise on the big screen in Star Trek Beyond, and while there’s been plenty of talk of instalment (see projects from S.J. Clarkson, Quentin Tarantino, and most recently Noah Hawley), so far there’s been no official word from Paramount Pictures regarding the future of the Trek movie franchise.

Well, according to Simon Pegg, who plays Scotty in the Kelvin timeline, the reason the franchise has stalled is because the movies have become to expensive to make since J.J. Abrams and Bad Robot rebooted the franchise as a big budget blockbuster back in 2009.

“The fact is, Star Trek movies don’t make Marvel money,” Pegg told Games Radar. “They make maybe $500 million at the most, and to make one now, on the scale they’ve set themselves, is $200 million. You have to make three times that to make a profit.”

“I don’t feel like the last one… They didn’t really take advantage of the 50th anniversary,” he continued. “The regimen at the time dropped the ball on the promo of the film. And we’ve lost momentum. I think losing Anton Yelchin was a huge blow to our little family, and our enthusiasm to do another one might have been affected by that. So I don’t know.”


Prior to the 2009 reboot, which had a budget of $150 million, 1998’s Star Trek: Insurrection had been the most expensive Trek movie, costing $70 million to produce. However, Star Trek Into Darkness and Star Trek Beyond pushed the franchise into $200 million territory, and given the modest box office returns ($467.4 million and $343.5 million respectively), it’s not too surprising that Paramount appears to have balked at the idea of a fourth outing.

So, does this mean we’ve seen the last of the Kelvin crew? It’s certainly starting to feel that way, with Pegg having previously stated that he doesn’t believe the NuTrek cast will be featured in Noah Hawley’s project, and the Fargo and Legion creator all but confirming that back in January when he stated that he has his “own take” on the material – one which could presumably look to take the series back into mid-budget territory.

Will you be disappointed if we’ve seen the last of Pegg and company? How would you like to see the Star Trek franchise moving forward? Let us know your thoughts in the comments or on our social channels @FlickeringMyth…

 

Filed Under: Gary Collinson, Movies, News Tagged With: Noah Hawley, Quentin Tarantino, S.J. Clarkson, Simon Pegg, Star Trek, Star Trek 4

About Gary Collinson

Gary Collinson is a film, television and digital content writer and producer, and the founder and editor-in-chief of the pop culture media brand Flickering Myth. As a producer, his work includes the gothic horror feature The Baby in the Basket and suspense thriller Death Among the Pines, and he is also the author of the book Holy Franchise, Batman! Bringing the Caped Crusader to the Screen.

WATCH OUR NEW FILM FOR FREE ON TUBI

FMTV – Watch Our Latest Video Here

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:

The Essential Movies About Memory

Horror’s Revenge: The 2026 Oscars and the Genre’s Long-Overdue Moment

2025 in Film: What Did We Learn?

10 Cult 70s Horror Gems You May Have Missed

Francis Ford Coppola In And Out Of The Wilderness

Incredible TV Shows That Were Cancelled Too Soon

Inception at 15: The Story Behind Christopher Nolan’s Mind-Melding Sci-Fi Actioner

10 Movie Franchises That Need To End

The Best 90s and 00s Horror Movies That Rotten Tomatoes Hate!

The Next 007: 3 Actors Who Could Lead James Bond Into the New Era

FEATURED POSTS:

Movie Review – Lee Cronin’s The Mummy (2026)

Movie Review – Normal (2025)

Movie Review – Mile End Kicks (2025)

4K Ultra HD Review – The Killer (1989)

Movie Review – Wasteman (2025)

The Top 5 Moments from Malcolm in the Middle: Life’s Still Unfair

The Unexpected Humor Behind The Texas Chain Saw Massacre

Movie Review – Erupcja (2026)

Clive Barker’s Hellraiser Universe: Ambition, Excess, and the Franchise That Could Have Been

10 Essential Holidays Gone Wrong Movies

FLICKERING MYTH FILMS

 

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:

10 Alien Franchise Rip-Offs That Are Worth A Watch

1995: The Year Horror Sequels Hit Rock Bottom?

Dust in the Eye: Ten Tear-Jerking Moments in Action Movies

9 Characters (And Their Roles) We Need In Marvel Rivals

  • Pop Culture
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Comic Books
    • Video Games
    • Toys & Collectibles
  • Features
    • News
    • Reviews
    • Articles and Opinions
    • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • FMTV on YouTube
  • About
    • About Flickering Myth
    • Write for Flickering Myth
    • Advertise on Flickering Myth
  • Socials
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Flipboard
    • Bluesky
    • Linktree
  • Terms
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

© Flickering Myth Limited. All rights reserved. The reproduction, modification, distribution, or republication of the content without permission is strictly prohibited. Movie titles, images, etc. are registered trademarks / copyright their respective rights holders. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. If you can read this, you don't need glasses.


 

Flickering MythLogo Header Menu
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Flickering Myth Films
  • About Flickering Myth
  • Write for Flickering Myth